Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
March 26, 2026Review of Policy Research

Scientists, Knowledge, and Coalitions: A Discourse Network Analysis of Offshore Wind Debates

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

ANAerang Nam

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Analyzes scientists' influence on offshore wind policy debates, revealing their coalition alignments and insights.

Key Points

  • The research aims to explore the role of scientists in public policy debates regarding offshore wind energy.
  • Utilized a dataset of 1275 policy statements from news articles and public testimonies
  • Applied statistical network analysis to examine science and policy interactions
  • Anchored in the Advocacy Coalition Framework to assess coalition dynamics
  • Scientists align with advocacy coalitions and emphasize evidence-based policy problems
  • They demonstrate a more central role when government positions conflict with their coalitions
  • Findings enhance understanding of the relationship between scientists and policy advocacy

Cite This Study

Aerang Nam (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c4ccc9fdc3bde448918526https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.70085
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Coalition dynamics through discourse in U.S. wind energy policy2026
  2. 2Of Issue Advocates and Honest Brokers: Participation of U.S. and German scientists in COVID-19 policy disputes2025
  3. 3Coalition Science: Bridging Imaginaries Between Collocated Communities in the Polar Oceans2025
  4. 4Discourse competition and fragmented echoes: A computational frame analysis of climate change debate on Platform X2026
  5. 5Orchestrating the climate choir: the boundaries of scientists’ expertise, the relevance of experiential knowledge, and quality assurance in the public climate debate2024 · 4 citations