Demonstrates improved thermal management in electric vehicles using a sustainable phase change material, highlighting its potential safety benefits.
Electric vehicle lithium-ion batteries experience severe transient thermal loads during real-world driving, where elevated temperatures and cell-to-cell nonuniformity accelerate aging and can precipitate thermal runaway. This study proposes a sustainable, passive battery thermal management system based on a nano-enhanced bio-based phase change material (NE-BBPCM) from paraffin wax, walnut shell biochar, and reduced graphene oxide (rGO). rGO was incorporated at 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, and 1.0 wt% via probe ultrasonication, and the composite was microencapsulated to mitigate leakage. DSC and microscopy confirmed preserved phase change behavior and a conductive filler network, while thermophysical testing showed a conductivity rise from 0.25 to 1.5-1.85 W/m·K with latent heat retained at 2.5-220 kJ/kg. Increasing rGO reduced the melt time from 1850 s to 1580 s, increased the maximum temperature suppression from 8.4°C to 12.8°C, shortened the recovery time from 620 s to 530 s, and improved cycling stability to 490 cycles. A3S2P Samsung 18650 module with a 2 mm PCM layers was tested under WLTP and UDDS profiles using thermocouples and IR thermography and was simulated in ANSYS fluent and a UDF heat generation model. Model validation yielded RSME of 1.51°C (WLTP peak), 1.32°C (UDDS peak), and 1.16°C (WLTP PCM average), within the estimated ±1.9°C experimental uncertainty. With rGO PCM, cell temperature decreased from 57.8–58.6°C to 53.7–54.2°C, WLTP/UDSS peak reduction reached 4.4/3.6°C, and cooling time from 55°C to °C dropped from 840 to 545 s (11.4Wh saved) under high speed 35°C ambient, NE-BBPCM reduced peak temperature from 62.4°C to 56.7°C. Overall, NE-BBPCM enables a robust, validated, and scalable passive battery thermal management system for EV duty cycles with improved uniformity and safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arjun D. Sharma (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: