In vitro study assesses enamel surface effects of charcoal dentifrices, indicating potential mineral loss.
This in vitro study aimed to assess the effects of the inorganic elements in charcoal-based dentifrices on the bovine enamel in terms of surface morphology and composition. Enamel surfaces (n = 10/group) obtained from bovine incisors were brushed with the conventional toothpaste Oral-B Complete (OBC; negative control), the whitening toothpaste Colgate Luminous White Expert (LWE; positive control), and the activated charcoal-based dentifrices Colgate Natural Extracts Purifying (CNE), Curaprox Black Is White (CBW), and Oral-B 3D White Mineral Clean (OBW). Enamel samples were analyzed using microenergy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (μ-EDXRF), surface roughness (Ra), contact angle (CA), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). FT-Raman and Fourier-Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and SEM were used to analyze the particulate fractions of the dentifrices. Enamel Ra varied between 0.029 (0.006) and 0.037 (0.006) and demonstrated no significant between-group difference. The CA values ranged from 90.59 (13.16) in the OBC to 102.6 (13.32) in the CBW, with no significance. μ-EDXRF revealed significant mineral loss with the OBC and CNE, while SEM confirmed deeper abrasion patterns linked to larger heterogeneous particles. FT-Raman and FTIR spectroscopy validated the compositional profiles, identifying silica, carbonates, hydrogen peroxide, and charcoal that explain the observed changes. Overall, charcoal-based dentifrice CNE produced the greatest mineral depletion and heterogeneity, whereas LWE, CBW, and OBW maintained more intermediate or protective effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alvarenga et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: