Study evaluated roughness of resin composite in extracted molars using charcoal toothpaste, indicating higher abrasion from charcoal dentifrice.
Background Charcoal dentifrices are marketed as an alternative to whitening treatments. However, there is a lack of evidence that supports its effect, as well as potential abrasive wear. This study's objective was to evaluate the roughness of a nano‐hybrid resin composite during six months of simulated toothbrushing using a charcoal‐containing toothpaste, a conventional toothpaste, and a control group using deionised water. Methods Sixty maxillary and mandibular extracted molars were prepared and restored with a nano‐hybrid resin composite, with specimens divided into three groups ( n = 20): A charcoal‐containing toothpaste, a conventional toothpaste, and a distilled water control. Simulated toothbrushing was accomplished with dentifrice slurry at 200 g‐force for 120 cycles per minute for a total of 5,000 cycles, which was equivalent to six months of normal toothbrush use. Specimens were scanned with a laser microscope at baseline and after simulated brushing, with roughness recorded. Results No difference ( p = 0.6189) was identified between the groups regarding restoration surface roughness before simulated brushing. Significantly greater ( p = 0.0323) roughness after brushing was identified with the charcoal toothpaste as compared to the similar ( p > 0.9999) conventional toothpaste and distilled water control. Comparison of roughness before and after brushing within each group identified no significant roughness differences within the distilled water (p = 0.5825) and conventional toothpaste ( p = 0.5915) groups, while a significant difference ( p = 0.0147) was found within the charcoal toothpaste group. Conclusion Under the conditions of this study, a charcoal‐containing toothpaste caused significantly more resin composite surface roughness as compared to a conventional toothpaste and distilled water control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eckert et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: