Why the study?
Existing ESC guidelines do not cover non-cardiac surgery in ACHD patients, whose unique pathophysiology and distinct physiology increase risks of perioperative complications, perioperative mortality, and prolonged hospitalization.
This clinical consensus statement provides tailored, multidisciplinary practical advice for the perioperative anaesthetic management of adults with congenital heart disease undergoing non-cardiac surgery, addressing a specific gap in current guidelines.
Supports tailored multidisciplinary anesthetic care for ACHD non-cardiac surgery; extends guidelines by addressing a specific gap.
Adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients often require non-cardiac surgery (NCS) and the need of such interventions is growing as the population ages. The intricacies inherent to their distinct physiology pose ACHD patients at a higher risk of perioperative complications, perioperative mortality, longer length of stay, and higher hospital charges compared with the general population. While 2020 ESC guidelines comprehensively address most aspects of ACHD care, they do not cover this specific area. Furthermore, although risk assessment for non-cardiac surgery is included in the 2022 ESC Guidelines on Cardiovascular Assessment and Management of Patients Undergoing Non-Cardiac Surgery, the unique pathophysiology of ACHD patients necessitates tailored considerations. The aim of this clinical consensus statement is to address the specific situations and needs of ACHD patients undergoing NCS from a multidisciplinary and practical point of view and to describe the organization of care for this complex group of patients. A group of experienced professionals from 4 cardiology and anaesthesiology scientific societies [the ESC Working Group on ACHD, the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC), the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (EACTAIC), and the International Society of Adult Congenital Heart Disease (ISACHD)] have evaluated the available scientific data and reached expert consensus in areas of gaps in evidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dos-Subirà et al. (2026) studied this question. Expert consensus outlines tailored practical advice and multidisciplinary care organization for the anesthetic management of adults with congenital heart disease undergoing non-cardiac surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: