"AlPO 4"-coated LiCoO 2 was shown to exhibit markedly improved capacity retention relative to bare LiCO 2 upon cycling to 4.7 V, Scanning and transmission electron microscopy imaging showed that the coating thickness of "AlPOV 4"-coated LiCoO 2 varied from ??? 10 to ??? 100 nm. Energy-dispersive X-ray mapping revealed that the coating was not single-phase "AlPO 4", rather consisting of P-rich thick regions (???100 nm) and Al-rich thin regions (???10 nm). Detailed X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) studies of the "AlPO 4"-coated LiCoO 2 in comparison to bare LiCoO 2 and various reference compounds such as Li 2CO 3, Li 3PO 4, and AlPO4 indicate that (1) AlPO 4 is absent on the surface; (2) the surface consisted of Li 3PO 4 and heavily Al substituted LiAl yCo 1-yO 2, which may result from AlPO 4 nanoparticles reacting with bare LiCoO 2 during the coating heat treatment at 700??C; and (3) the amount of surface Li 2CO 3 is markedly reduced in the coated sample relative to the bare LiCoO 2. The existence of Li 3PO 4 in "AlPO 4"-coated LiCoO 2 was confirmed with X-ray powder diffraction. The coating microstructure of "AlPO 4"- coated LICoO 2 is proposed, and the mechanisms of enhancement in the cycling and thermal characteristics by particle surface microstructure are discussed in detail.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Appapillai et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: