Key result
GLS improvement in AL amyloidosis correlates strongly with right ventricular and left atrial strain recovery.
Why the study?
The study aimed to identify echocardiographic parameters that correlate with cardiac response to treatment in patients with light chain cardiac amyloidosis (AL-CA).
Does improvement in global longitudinal strain (GLS) correlate with improvements in right ventricular and left atrial strain parameters and overall survival in patients with light chain cardiac amyloidosis receiving treatment?
Cohort (n=39)
No
Does improvement in global longitudinal strain (GLS) correlate with improvements in right ventricular and left atrial strain parameters and overall survival in patients with light chain cardiac amyloidosis receiving treatment?
In patients with light chain cardiac amyloidosis undergoing treatment, improvements in global longitudinal strain correlate strongly with improvements in right ventricular and left atrial strain—with RV strain improvements detectable within one year—supporting multi-chamber speckle-tracking strain imaging as a complementary tool to biomarkers for monitoring therapeutic response.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support multi-chamber strain monitoring in treated cardiac amyloidosis; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
Purpose The aim of this study was to identify echocardiographic parameters which correlate with cardiac response to treatment in patients with light chain cardiac amyloidosis (AL‐CA). Methods We identified 39 patients with AL‐CA treated at City of Hope and divided them into two cohorts; cardiac responders as defined by improvement in global longitudinal strain (GLS) over time and cardiac non‐responders as defined by no change or worsening in GLS. We then compared baseline demographics and echocardiographic parameters between the two groups. Results There were 16 cardiac responders and 23 cardiac non‐responders identified. Correlation between changes in GLS was compared with change in other echocardiographic parameters. The change in GLS correlated with changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ( r = −0.44, p < 0.01), stroke volume index ( r = −0.05, p < 0.01), posterior wall thickness ( r = 0.41, p = 0.01), right ventricular (RV) free wall strain ( r = 0.66, p < 0.01), right ventricular four‐chamber longitudinal strain ( r = 0.67, p < 0.01), left atrial conduit strain ( r = 0.46, p < 0.01), left atrial reservoir strain ( r = −0.63, p < 0.01), and left atrial contractile strain ( r = 0.48, p < 0.01). At less than 1 year, there was a positive correlation between change in GLS and change in RV free wall strain ( r = 0.73, p < 0.01) and change in right ventricular four‐chamber longitudinal strain ( r = 0.75, p < 0.01). Conclusion Improvement in GLS correlated with improvement in RV and left atrial strain measurements in AL‐CA patients receiving treatment. Changes in RV strain were seen early, within 1 year of treatment. Our study suggests that strain imaging in conjunction with cardiac biomarkers can provide a comprehensive assessment of cardiac response.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ng et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Light chain cardiac amyloidosis (AL-CA) (n=39). Cardiac responder status (defined by improvement in global longitudinal strain over time) vs. Cardiac non-responder status (defined by no change or worsening in global longitudinal strain) was evaluated on Correlation between change in global longitudinal strain (GLS) and change in right ventricular four-chamber longitudinal strain (RV4CLS) (r = 0.67, p=<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: