PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 27, 2026Metrology2 citationsOpen Access

Interlaboratory Comparison of SI-Traceable Flow Metering Calibration Facilities with Gaseous Carbon Dioxide

View Full Paper
AAAra AbdulrahmanGCGabriele ChinelloRSRevata Seneviratne

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess the accuracy of CO2 flow meter calibration across different facilities for standards compliance.
  • Five calibration facilities participated in an interlaboratory comparison using CO2 gas.
  • Calibration was conducted at flow rates up to 400 m3/h and pressures of 31 bar(a).
  • Flow metering principles were compared across various facilities to evaluate consistency.
  • Critical flow Venturi nozzles were tested to observe vibrational effects on measurements.
  • At intermediate-scale facilities, calibration differences between VSL and INRIM were within CMC values.
  • NEL exhibited significant calibration differences due to vibrational effects.
  • 91% of large-scale test points passed equivalency criteria for flow rates between 20 m3/h to 400 m3/h.
  • The Coriolis meter confirmed traceability for CO2 across the participating facilities.

Abstract

Carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) plays an important role in meeting the European Union’s target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 55% by 2030 and become carbon neutral by 2050. Accurate flow metering is required throughout the carbon capture and storage (CCS) chain to meet fiscal and regulatory requirements. To establish accurate CO2 flow metering, flow meters must be calibrated with traceability to international standards of measurement at relevant flow conditions. To ensure confidence, reliability, and comparability of calibration results, calibration facilities perform interlaboratory comparisons. However, there is currently a lack of CO2 gas flow meter calibration facilities. The flow metering calibration facilities of VSL, NEL, INRIM, DNV, and FORCE participated in an interlaboratory comparison with CO2 up to 400 m3/h and 31 bar(a) to compare the calibration results with several flow metering principles. At the intermediate-scale facilities of NEL, VSL, and INRIM, the difference in results between the VSL and INRIM facilities were within the facilities’ CMC values, while NEL’s facility showed a significant difference primarily due to vibrational relaxational effects of CO2 with small critical flow Venturi nozzles. At the large-scale facilities of NEL, DNV, and FORCE, 91% of the test points passed the equivalency criteria in the range of 20 m3/h to 400 m3/h with a Coriolis meter, confirming traceability for carbon dioxide across the facilities. Overall, the interlaboratory comparison has made it possible for the CCUS industry to calibrate gaseous CO2 flow meters with traceability to international standards.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Abdulrahman et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c61f8515a0a509bde18071https://doi.org/10.3390/metrology6020022
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper