Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental determination of the hygric properties of building materials often relies on costly equipment, limiting access in resource-constrained laboratories. This study presents the development and preliminary validation of a hygrothermal chamber with continuous mass monitoring, built from a reused laboratory oven. The system independently regulates temperature and relative humidity (RH) and continuously measures sample mass, using approximately €146 in components (excluding the oven). Its performance was assessed under three hygrothermal scenarios using six materials, with comparisons against a climatic chamber and saturated salt solutions. The mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE) relative to the setpoints were 0.41 °C and 0.96 °C for temperature and 0.43 %RH and 1.30 %RH for relative humidity, respectively. The load cell could not reliably resolve the small mass changes of non-hygroscopic crushed glass. For a single Moabi wood specimen, comparison with a reference balance yielded an MAE of 1.26 and an RMSE of 1.38 percentage points of dry-mass water content (N=9), with a positive mean bias of 1.18 percentage points. The chamber offers a promising low-cost platform for preliminary hygric experiments, although further validation is needed. Sorption isotherms, water vapor permeability and moisture buffer value remain to be determined.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Praya et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: