Quasi-experimental study evaluates breakfast program's effects on nutrition knowledge and memory in school children, indicating short-term benefits but limited long-term sustainability.
Inadequate breakfast consumption among school children affects cognitive function, academic performance, and health, highlighting the need for school-based nutrition interventions. This study evaluates the short- and longer-term impact of the GESIT school breakfast programme on nutrition knowledge, breakfast nutrient intake, and short-term memory among elementary students aged 9–11 in Bogor, Indonesia. A pre-post quasi-experimental design was used across three groups: Breakfast intervention with education (BreakfastEdu group), nutrition education only (Education group), and a control group. Longer-term evaluation occurred three months post-intervention. Subjects were grade 4–5 students (n=212). The intervention lasted 20 school days. Data was collected on socio-economic characteristics, breakfast nutrient intake, nutrition knowledge, and short-term memory. Short-term impacts showed the highest nutrition knowledge improvements in the BreakfastEdu (p<0.001) and Education groups (p<0.001). Energy, protein, total fat, vitamins A, B1, B2, C, D, calcium, potassium, polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA), alpha-linolenic acid (ALA), and linoleic acid (LA) intake increased in the BreakfastEdu group (p<0.05) from baseline to endline. Short-term memory scores improved only in the BreakfastEdu group (p=0.01). Significant differences from baseline-endline between groups were observed for these nutrients, except for protein, PUFA, ALA, and LA intake. Initial intervention gains diminished after three months without reinforcement. Post hoc mixed-effect sensitivity analysis attenuated significance when school-level clustering was taken into consideration. The GESIT programme enhanced short-term breakfast nutrient intake in the BreakfastEdu group. While nutrition knowledge and memory improved within intervention groups, long-term impact was not sustained. Future programmes should incorporate continuous education and school policy support to maintain results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rachman et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: