Key result
Distinguishing physiologic LV remodeling from pathological dilation presents a significant challenge in athletes with AR.
Why the study?
Distinguishing physiologic LV remodeling from pathological LV dilation in athletes with aortic regurgitation is challenging and literature on this topic is sparse.
Case Report (n=1)
A detailed exercise training history is essential in interpreting imaging data for athletes with regurgitant valve lesions and abnormal chamber dimensions.
Caution needed evaluating athletes with AR and LV dilation for sports participation; leaves open specific criteria to distinguish physiologic versus pathologic remodeling.
BACKGROUND: Distinguishing physiologic left ventricular (LV) remodeling from pathological LV dilation is a challenge among athletes with aortic regurgitation (AR). CASE SUMMARY: max of 47 mL/kg/min (135% predicted) with reduction in AR severity during exercise. Surgery was deferred, and a return-to-play strategy with longitudinal surveillance was developed. DISCUSSION: Although regurgitant valvular disease is typically well tolerated in competitive athletes, the literature on this topic is sparse. TAKE-HOME MESSAGE: A detailed exercise training history is essential in the clinical interpretation of imaging data among athletes with regurgitant valve lesions and abnormal chamber dimensions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zoellner et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Aortic regurgitation and progressive left ventricular dilation (n=1). Return-to-play strategy with longitudinal surveillance was evaluated. A detailed exercise training history and longitudinal surveillance allowed a professional hockey player with aortic regurgitation and LV dilation to defer surgery and return to play.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: