Key result
GDMT improves clinical outcomes in adults with congenital heart disease and LV dysfunction.
Why the study?
There are limited data about the role of guideline-directed medical therapy in adults with congenital heart disease presenting with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
Does guideline-directed medical therapy uptitration improve cardiac function, congestion, and mortality in adults with congenital heart disease and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction?
Cohort (n=327)
Does guideline-directed medical therapy uptitration improve cardiac function, congestion, and mortality in adults with congenital heart disease and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction?
Uptitration of guideline-directed medical therapy in adults with congenital heart disease and reduced ejection fraction is associated with improved cardiac function, reduced congestion, and lower long-term risk of death or transplant.
Warrants GDMT in ACHD with LV dysfunction; extends HF evidence to this population.
BACKGROUND: There are limited data about the role of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in adults with congenital heart disease presenting with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the effect of GDMT on cardiac function, congestion, and mortality in adults with congenital heart disease presenting with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. We hypothesized that GDMT uptitration was associated with improved cardiac function, less congestion, and lower mortality. METHODS: GDMT score, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and N-terminal pro-b-type brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels were assessed at baseline encounter (baseline GDMT score) and 1-year follow-up. Delta (Δ) GDMT was calculated as GDMT at 1 year minus GDMT at baseline. GDMT uptitration was defined as ΔGDMT score > 0. RESULTS: Of 327 patients (age 46 ± 16 years; LVEF 31 ± 6%), the baseline GDMT score was 2 (1,3), and 135 (41%) had GDMT uptitration. Although patients with GDMT uptitration had similar LVEF and NT-proBNP levels at baseline encounter compared to patients without GDMT uptitration, the GDMT uptitration group had greater temporal improvement in LVEF (relative ΔLVEF 32 ± 12% vs 15 ± 7%; P < 0.001), reduction in NT-proBNP levels (relative ΔNT-proBNP -39 ± 15% vs -21 ± 19%; P < 0.001), and a lower 10-year incidence of death/transplant (38% vs 59%; P = 0.002). Higher ΔGDMT score (adjusted HR: 0.68 [95% CI: 0.54-0.83]; P < 0.001) and ΔLVEF (adjusted HR: 0.79 [95% CI: 0.65-0.96], P = 0.002) were associated with a lower risk of death/transplant. CONCLUSIONS: GDMT uptitration was associated with improved cardiac function, less congestion, and a lower incidence of death/transplant. Overall GDMT score was low, and only 41% of patients had GDMT uptitration, suggesting suboptimal therapy and need for optimization of heart failure therapy in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kholeif et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Congenital heart disease with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (n=327). Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) uptitration vs. No GDMT uptitration was evaluated on 10-year incidence of death/transplant (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.54-0.83, p=<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: