Reveals eleven pitfalls in prediction modelling research, indicating key challenges in design and analysis.
This paper discusses eleven pitfalls in the design, analysis, and reporting of medical prediction modelling research. These concern pitfalls related to timing and quality of measurements (i.e., incorporating future predictors, differences in the precision of measurements between development and implementation, outcome misclassification, and predictors with missing values), pitfalls related to modelling (i.e., univariate pre-selection of potential predictors, overfitting the data, and simplifying the model too much), pitfalls related to reporting and model interpretation (i.e., being unclear about the prediction time-horizon, ignoring treatments after time-zero, and conflating prediction and causal research), and pitfalls related to the focus on something new (i.e., developing a new model).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Groenwold et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: