This article proposes a framework for measuring inclusion in education, highlighting equity and diversity implications.
This article explores the conceptual framework of inclusion through a holistic, integrative, and sustainability-driven lens. Inclusion is not merely seen as an effort to expand educational access for individuals with special needs, but as a multidimensional social paradigm that highlights equity, justice, and appreciation of diversity within the scope of sustainable development. The study proposes five core pillars: inclusive services, inclusive learning, inclusive research, community participation, and positive culture and attitudes, all of which are interconnected to shape a fair and sustainable socio-educational ecosystem. The analysis underscores that inclusion cannot be limited to a sectoral agenda; rather, it should be advanced as a transformative cross-sectoral strategy that is responsive to social dynamics and the evolving times. In this way, the article makes an academic contribution by offering a comprehensive conceptual mapping and, at the same time, provides practical guidance for the formulation, evaluation, and implementation of adaptive and participatory inclusion policies and programs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ediyanto et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: