Numerical simulations demonstrate fatigue delamination in composite laminates, indicating structural effects on damage behavior.
Repeated impact loading can induce progressive fatigue delamination in composite laminates, in which both damage accumulation and strain-rate sensitivity of the interlaminar interface play important roles. In this work, an adopted rate-dependent fatigue cohesive formulation is extended to a three-dimensional framework for simulating interlaminar delamination in composite laminates subjected to repeated impact. The constitutive formulation incorporates separation-rate-dependent critical tractions and fracture toughness together with cumulative fatigue damage, enabling a unified description of dynamic rate effects and progressive interface degradation. A time-incremental algorithm is developed and implemented in ABAQUS 2020/Explicit through a user-defined cohesive element subroutine (VUEL). The cohesive formulation is further coupled with the Hashin intralaminar failure criterion to represent the interaction between interlaminar delamination and intralaminar damage. Numerical simulations are conducted for composite laminates with three structural configurations—conventional, drop-off, and wrapped drop-off—to systematically examine the influence of rate dependence on fatigue delamination under repeated impact. The results show that the developed framework captures the progressive evolution of delamination and impact response under repeated impact and indicate that the sensitivity to rate-dependent interlayer properties depends on both laminate configuration and impact velocity. The present study provides a feasible computational framework for the comparative simulation and assessment of fatigue delamination under repeated impact and offers numerical insight into the role of structural configuration and interfacial rate dependence in composite laminates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: