Examines the relationships between burnout, stress, and self-efficacy among teachers, suggesting important implications for mental health.
The aim of this study is to examine the relationships between occupational burnout, occupational stress, and self-efficacy among teachers. Accordingly, data were collected from a total of 773 teachers (485 female, 288 male) working in Arnavutköy district during the 2024-2025 academic year. Participants were selected using a random sampling method. This sampling method involves the researcher selecting a portion of the population based on a predetermined sample size. The data were analyzed using the SPSS statistical program. The results revealed a significant negative relationship between self-efficacy and occupational stress (r = -0.326, p < .001), self-efficacy and chronic fatigue (r = -0.398, p < .001), and self-efficacy and acute fatigue (r = -0.327, p < .001), while a significant positive relationship was found between self-efficacy and recovery (r = 0.399, p < .001). A positive relationship was observed between occupational stress and chronic fatigue (r = 0.697, p < .001) and between occupational stress and acute fatigue (r = 0.564, p < .001), whereas a negative relationship was found between occupational stress and recovery (r = -0.517, p < .001). Additionally, a positive relationship was found between chronic fatigue and acute fatigue (r = 0.670, p < .001), while chronic fatigue and recovery were negatively correlated (r = -0.629, p < .001). A negative correlation was also monitored between acute fatigue and recovery (r = -0.621, p < .001). Furthermore, significant differences were observed in the variables based on gender, type of institution, satisfaction with the city of residence, and job selection satisfaction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kurbunar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: