Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study evaluates antibiotic prescribing in a Nigerian tertiary hospital, indicating the need for stronger AMS programs.
Objective: To evaluate antibiotic prescribing practices in a Nigerian tertiary hospital using World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended process measures for Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS). Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study. Patient folders (n = 231) between July 2019 and July 2020 were reviewed using a standardized tool. Relevant data were extracted and analyzed descriptively using SPSS v23, after ethical approval. Setting: Jos University Teaching Hospital (JUTH), a tertiary hospital in Nigeria. Participants: A simple random sample of patients admitted to the male medical wards during the review period. Results: Antibiotics were prescribed in 178 cases (77.1%) but only 149 (64.5%) had a documented indication. Of the patients with no documented indication for antibiotics, 35.3% still received them, often justified as prophylaxis. Ceftriaxone (31.8%) and metronidazole (24.5%) were the most prescribed antibiotics. Correct posology was observed in 77.5% of prescriptions. Adherence to prescribed regimens was low (25.3%), with financial constraints and missed doses being major barriers. Antibiotic time-outs were observed in 34.3% of cases with only 24.7% cases shifting to definitive therapy based on culture results. Empirical therapy accounted for 75.3% of prescriptions. Conclusion: The study revealed suboptimal implementation of AMS principles, characterized by a high reliance on empirical therapy and poor adherence to guideline-based practices. This underscores the urgent need for institutional AMS programs to optimize antibiotic use in similar low- and middle-income country hospital settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fodeke et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: