This research uncovers genomic DNA repair networks following CRISPR/Cas9-induced breaks, suggesting optimization methods for genome editing.
CRISPR/Cas9-induced DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) trigger diverse repair outcomes, yet the dynamic regulatory networks governing these outcomes remain incompletely understood. Here, we develop indel pattern-guided repair mapping, an integrative framework that deciphers DSB repair mechanisms by integrating repair outcome spectra, kinetic dynamics, and functional gene regulation. Our analysis categorizes Cas9-mediated repair outcomes into seven distinct patterns based on their frequency and sequence characteristics, revealing differential repair kinetics among these subtypes. Functional clustering identifies three regulatory pillars: (i) microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ)-driven MH deletions form a cohesive module defined by a shared regulatory network of protein-coding genes and miRNAs, rather than by the core repair enzymes themselves; (ii) non-homologous end joining coordinates 1 bp insertions and non-MH deletions, with RFC4/5 stabilizing repair templates to suppress large deletions; (iii) Atypical repair outcomes show distinct genetic signatures: large insertions are associated with polymerase-related regulators, whereas mutations are associated with a signature enriched for chromatin-associated regulators. Strikingly, S100A8 emerges as a potent MMEJ suppressor via direct interaction with PARP1, revealing unappreciated cross-talk between inflammatory signaling and DSB repair pathway choice. By linking repair outcome patterns to molecular determinants, our work provides a transformative platform to interrogate DNA repair mechanisms for precise genome editing optimization and therapeutic genome stabilization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: