Key result
DOACs early after cardiac surgery show no benefit over warfarin for major events.
Why the study?
This pilot trial was conducted to evaluate the feasibility of a larger randomized controlled trial comparing DOACs to warfarin early after cardiac surgery.
Does direct oral anticoagulation compared to warfarin improve feasibility and clinical outcomes in adults early after cardiac surgery?
RCT (n=100)
Open-label
1:1
Yes
Does direct oral anticoagulation compared to warfarin improve feasibility and clinical outcomes in adults early after cardiac surgery?
Absolute Event Rate: 8% vs 4%
p-value: p=0.42
This pilot RCT demonstrates that a standardized DOAC protocol early after cardiac surgery is feasible to implement, though recruitment challenges and patient aversion to warfarin highlight important considerations for designing a definitive multicenter trial.
DOAC protocol is feasible early after cardiac surgery; leaves open comparative clinical outcomes versus warfarin pending larger multicenter trials.
Background: To conduct a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) early after cardiac surgery to determine the feasibility of a larger RCT.Methods: We conducted an open-label, two-site, pilot RCT of adults undergoing cardiac surgery with an indication for anticoagulation, excluding mechanical valves and bioprosthetic mitral valve replacements.We randomized patients 1:1 to DOAC or warfarin started during the index hospitalization with a standardized time of post-operative initiation and bridging for high thrombosis risk.The coprimary feasibility outcome goals were recruitment of 70% eligible patients and adherence to the anticoagulation protocol in 80% patients.The primary clinical composite outcome included all-cause mortality, major bleeding, stroke, systemic embolism, or pericardial effusion requiring intervention within 3 months.Results: Between October 2022 and February 2024, 547 patients were screened, 163 met inclusion criteria, 104 were randomized, and 100 were analyzed (50 in each group).Median age was 72 years, 22% were female, 54% had pre-existing atrial fibrillation, 37% had post-operative atrial fibrillation, with median CHA2DS2-VASc 3 and HAS-BLED 2. We recruited 64% of eligible patients and anticoagulation protocol adherence was 91%.The clinical composite outcome occurred in 8% with DOAC (2 major bleeding, 1 pericardial effusion, 1 death) vs 4% with warfarin (2 strokes); log-rank p=0.42. Conclusions:Although the a priori recruitment goal was not met, this trial supports the need for and gains valuable insights into key challenges to mitigate, which guides the design of a large, definitive multicenter RCT comparing DOACs versus warfarin in cardiac surgery patients.Registration of clinical trial: Clinicaltrials.govNCT05006287 (registered 2021-08-16)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Cardiac surgery requiring anticoagulation (n=100). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs. Warfarin was evaluated on Composite of all-cause mortality, major bleeding, stroke, systemic embolism, or pericardial effusion requiring intervention within 3 months (p=0.42). Direct oral anticoagulants early after cardiac surgery resulted in an 8% rate of the primary clinical composite outcome compared to 4% with warfarin (p=0.42).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: