Retrospective cohort study evaluates improved outcomes in kidney transplant recipients using a multi-disciplinary approach, suggesting better care implications.
Background: Kidney transplantation remains the optimal treatment for end-stage renal disease. Perioperative management is crucial for short-term recovery and long-term graft outcomes. The Rosenthal effect demonstrates how positive expectations enhance results via self-fulfilling predictions, exhibiting advantages in healthcare settings; however, it remains understudied in transplant care. This study evaluated an innovative multi-disciplinary perioperative nursing model incorporating the Rosenthal effect for kidney transplant recipients compared with standard care. Methods: A retrospective cohort study included 144 kidney transplant recipients (July 2021–May 2025) divided into the innovative care (n = 74) and standard care (n = 70) groups. The innovative care group received multi-disciplinary team support with Rosenthal effect-based psychological care protocols, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols and 3-month digital follow-up. The primary outcomes were graft survival and acute rejection rates. The secondary outcomes included psychological status (anxiety and depression), quality of life, medication adherence, 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Statistical analysis included independent t-tests, chi-square tests and Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. Results: The innovative care group achieved superior 1-year graft survival (97.30% vs 91.43%, p = 0.042), reduced acute rejection (10.81% vs 24.29%, p = 0.031), lowered anxiety scores (40.34 ± 4.32 vs 44.36 ± 4.15, p < 0.001) and improved quality of life with higher SF-36 physical (48.76 ± 8.12 vs 42.34 ± 9.45, p < 0.001) and mental component scores (68.44 ± 8.91 vs 63.75 ± 9.12, p = 0.002). Conclusions: The novel multi-disciplinary nursing model was associated with significantly improved clinical outcomes, psychological status and quality of life in kidney transplant recipients. These findings support further investigation through prospective randomised trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2026 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: