Key result
HF dyadic coping reveals divergent perspectives, psychosocial depletion, family intimacy disruptions, and support needs.
Why the study?
To systematically evaluate how chronic heart failure patients and their informal caregivers jointly manage the disease, clarify their support needs, and inform targeted interventions.
Systematic Review (n=541)
Healthcare professionals should pay close attention to differences in thinking, psychological resource depletion, family intimacy tension, and supportive needs during the dyadic coping process to develop individualized interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clinicians should address dyadic coping challenges in HF; hypothesis-generating for individualized interventions.
Objectives To systematically evaluate the experiences of chronic heart failure patients and their informal caregivers in jointly managing the disease, clarify their support needs, and provide evidence for developing targeted interventions. Design A qualitative meta-synthesis. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP for qualitative studies examining the dyadic coping experiences of patients with chronic heart failure and their caregivers. The quality of the literature was evaluated according to the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research, and the included literature was integrated and analyzed using the pooled integration approach. Results A total of 16 studies were included. 55 findings were aggregated into 13 categories and further synthesized into 4 overarching themes: divergent perspectives on illness and care; psychosocial resource depletion; disruptions in family intimacy; and the need for multidimensional support to reconstruct personal meaning. Conclusions Healthcare professionals should pay close attention to differences in thinking, the degree of depletion of psychological resources, the tension in family intimacy, and supportive needs during the dyadic coping process between patients with chronic heart failure and their caregivers. Based on this, individualized interventions can be developed, leveraging digital technologies and platforms to enrich intervention formats and content, thereby enhancing collaborative disease management between both parties. Systematic Review Registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251243342 , CRD 420251243342.
He et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Chronic heart failure (n=541). Dyadic coping and support was evaluated on Qualitative themes of disease coping experiences and support needs. A qualitative meta-synthesis of 541 participants identified four main themes in the dyadic coping experiences of chronic heart failure patients and caregivers: divergent perspectives, psychosocial depletion, family intimacy disruptions, and support needs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: