Key result
Sirolimus-coated balloons yield similar 12-month target lesion failure rates compared to paclitaxel-coated balloons.
Why the study?
A head-to-head comparison between the novel biodegradable polymer microsphere sirolimus-coated balloon and currently available paclitaxel-coated balloons was lacking.
Does a sirolimus-coated balloon improve target lesion failure compared to a paclitaxel-coated balloon in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary artery disease?
Cohort (n=487)
Yes
Does a sirolimus-coated balloon improve target lesion failure compared to a paclitaxel-coated balloon in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary artery disease?
Effect estimate: aHR 0.97 (95% CI 0.37-2.52)
Absolute Event Rate: 4.3% vs 4%
A novel sirolimus-coated balloon demonstrated comparable 12-month clinical outcomes to a standard paclitaxel-coated balloon in patients undergoing PCI for de novo lesions and in-stent restenosis.
Sirolimus-coated balloon offers PCI alternative to paclitaxel; extends real-world DCB evidence but leaves open randomized confirmation.
Background SELUTION Sustained Limus Release (SEL, MedAlliance, Nyon, Switzerland) is a novel biodegradable polymer microsphere sirolimus-coated balloon (SCB) characterized by sustained coronary artery drug retention. A head-to-head comparison to currently available paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCB) is lacking. Objective To compare clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with SEL SCB and iopromide-based SeQuent Please / NEO (SEQ, B. Braun, Melsungen, Germany) PCB. Methods Consecutive all-comer patients undergoing PCI with SEL SCB or SEQ PCB for both de novo lesions and in-stent restenosis between January 2021 and December 2024 at two Italian centers were included in this observational, retrospective, investigator-initiated cohort study. The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF), defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 12-month follow-up. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to adjust for baseline differences. Results A total of 487 patients (589 lesions) were included: 250 patients (302 lesions) treated with SEL SCB and 237 patients (287 lesions) with SEQ PCB. At a median follow-up of 403 [223–617] days, the 12-month rate of TLF was similar between SEL SCB and SEQ PCB (4.3% vs. 4.0%; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.37–2.52) (Figure 1). No significant differences were observed in cardiac death (aHR: 2.84; 95% CI: 0.53–15.3), target vessel MI (aHR: 0.21; 95% CI: 0.03–1.79), or TLR (aHR: 1.23; 95% CI: 0.21–7.19). Results were consistent across prespecified subgroups (Figure 2). Conclusions The SELSEQ study suggests comparable clinical outcomes at 12-month follow-up among patients undergoing PCI with the biodegradable polymer microsphere SEL SCB and the iopromide-based SEQ PCB.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tartaglia et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease (n=487). SELUTION Sustained Limus Release sirolimus-coated balloon (SEL SCB) vs. SeQuent Please / NEO paclitaxel-coated balloon (SEQ PCB) was evaluated on Target lesion failure (composite of cardiac death, target vessel MI, and target lesion revascularization) at 12-month follow-up (aHR 0.97, 95% CI 0.37-2.52). PCI with a novel sirolimus-coated balloon yielded similar 12-month rates of target lesion failure compared to a paclitaxel-coated balloon (4.3% vs. 4.0%; aHR 0.97; 95% CI 0.37-2.52).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: