This essay analyzes the differing views of sociality and power in Moten and Butler, highlighting their critical disagreement.
Throughout his corpus, Fred Moten insists on a unique temporality: sociality is always primary, both temporally and logically. Power arrives to individuate this primary sociality, dividing it into subjects, but it survives fugitively as a struggle against power. At numerous points in their work, Judith Butler also posits sociality as primary, but with a crucial difference: power’s arrival enacts a totalizing constitutive force onto subjects, erasing any possibility of accessing the sociality that preceded and gave life to both power and subjects. This essay elaborates on this fundamental temporal disagreement between two of today’s most influential critical theorists.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elliot C. Mason (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: