Experimental study develops a high-boron tool steel, revealing its properties and potential as an alternative material.
High-alloy cold work tool steels rely on large additions of refractory elements to achieve high hardness and tempering resistance, resulting in elevated cost and resource consumption. In this study, a novel powder metallurgical high-boron tool steel is developed as an alternative that exploits boron-based hard phases (HP) in contrast to conventional carbide-based tool steels. Based on prior studies, the alloy designated SHB-1 (Fe-0.4C-1B-3.5Cr-1Mo-0.2V-1Si-0.8Mn, in wt.%), was derived empirically and produced by gas atomization followed by hot isostatic pressing and hot swaging. A microstructural analysis of the alloy SHB-1 by SEM, EBSD, EDS, WDS, and XRD reveals a homogeneous dispersion of approximately 15 vol.% HP consisting primarily of tetragonal M 2 B borides and M 23 (C,B) 6 carboborides embedded in a martensitic matrix. Carbon contents were systematically varied by diffusion alloying of the powder with graphite to assess their influence on the HP stability and tempering behavior. Increasing carbon prompted a gradual shift from boride- to carboboride-dominated HP populations while simultaneously increasing the carbon content dissolved in the matrix. Hardness measurements demonstrated high as-quenched hardness values of up to 775 HV10 and pronounced tempering resistance, with peak hardness values exceeding 640 HV10 after tempering at 550 °C. Fracture toughness testing of the master alloy yielded values of 25.5 M P a m after low-temperature tempering and 22.6 M P a m after high-temperature tempering, comparable to conventional high-alloy tool steels. The results demonstrate that high-boron contents combined with powder metallurgy enables a favorable balance of hardness, tempering resistance, and toughness with significantly reduced amounts of critical alloying elements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schaefer et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: