Compares costs of efanesoctocog alfa and factor VIII therapies for major surgeries, suggesting economic benefits.
• This study compared the costs of SHL, EHL and high-sustained FVIII products for surgical management in people with severe hemophilia A. • The high-sustained FVIII therapy efanesoctocog alfa resulted in 3 to 5.5 times fewer IU/Kg and may save $38,947 to $81,000 per surgery. We estimated total costs for perioperative hemostatic management with standard half-life (SHL), extended half-life (EHL) and high-sustained (efanesoctocog alfa) factor VIII (FVIII) products in people with severe hemophilia A. The data on dose, total factor consumption and target FVIII activity for major surgeries were collected from United States (US) prescribing information and phase 3 clinical trials. The differences in the total factor consumption and total costs between therapies were compared. The median total factor consumption per major surgery involving octocog alfa (SHL), rurioctocog alfa pegol (EHL), efmoroctocog alfa (EHL) and efanesoctocog alfa was 910, 629, 493 and 163 IU/Kg, respectively. The total factor costs were $162,308, $147,104, $120,233 and $81,286, respectively. Efanesoctocog alfa resulted in $81,022 to $38,947 savings versus SHL/EHL therapies per surgery. The perioperative management with efanesoctocog alfa was estimated to be markedly more economical than that with SHL and EHL therapies due to its high-sustained factor activity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Staber et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: