Statistical analysis assesses regional differences in discourse markers in 14 PFC surveys, indicating unique linguistic patterns.
To date, most studies using the Phonologie du Français Contemporain (PFC) corpus have focused mainly on the analysis of phonetics and phonology, and less on syntax and morphology. In this paper, we analyze how the functions and numbers of the occurrences of bon and ben as discourse markers (DMs) differ across the 14 PFC surveys. A two-way ANOVA is performed to determine whether there are statistically significant regional differences in their functions and the number of occurrences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seimiya et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: