Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The article examines event-led branding impacts in Japan, highlighting implications for national imagery and economy.
The purpose of this article is to examine and compare the main features and impacts of eventled branding in Japan (2013-2025). To this end, it analyzes the scope and rationales(s) of inward (domestic)- and outward (international/global)-oriented branding. The paper focuses on the cases of Tokyo (2020 Olympics) and Osaka (Expo 2025). The article argues that whilst mega-events serve as a conduit of public diplomacy to potentially update external perceptions/imagery of a host nation/city (i.e., through global media coverage/visibility), long-term branding/rebranding efforts ought not to be solely anchored to their (successive) hosting. Furthermore, it is argued that even though mega-events are markers of modernity, evidence does not support a causal link between mega-events and the foundation of a new (national) economy. The article focuses on the Japanese cities of Tokyo and Osaka to advance empirical and analytical underpinnings in the fields of political economy of mega-events and cultural economics, particularly vis-à-vis long-term (nation/city) branding. The originality of this article centers on providing up-to-date empirical evidence and potential branding pathways from an East Asian host city/nation, in both pre-pandemic and post-pandemic contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grace Gonzalez Basurto (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: