Shows differences in language learning beliefs and strategies in EFL learners, suggesting implications for teaching methods.
This study investigates university-age EFL learners' beliefs about language learning, their uses of learning strategies, and their self-efficacy and confidence, as related to their previous learning backgrounds.A questionnaire consisting of 78 Likert-scale questions was given to 182 Japanese university students with living-abroad experience (n = 104) and without it (n = 78).The main findings of the study were: (1) Learners without living-abroad experience (-LAE) showed stronger belief in analytic learning than did learners with living-abroad experience (+LAE), who showed greater adherence to beliefs in experiential learning; (2) -LAE learners used analytic learning strategies more frequently than did +LAE learners, who, in turn, resorted to more experiential learning strategies; (3) -LAE learners were more nervous and afraid of using English and less confident with their English abilities than were +LAE learners, but the former group was more confident about their ability to explain English grammar than was the latter; (4) There were overall modest positive relationships between the kinds of beliefs learners have and their uses of learning strategies; (5) The use of analytic strategies was generally related to less feelings of self-efficacy and less confidence in their English abilities, while the use of experiential strategies was related to more self-efficacy and more confidence in their English abilities.These results held true regardless of their previous learning backgrounds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Izumi et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: