PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 3, 2026Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology0 citationsOpen Access

Venoplasty-facilitated cardiac implantable electronic device implantation and upgrade: feasibility and outcomes from a single center

CMCan MenemencioğluElectrophysiologyUCUgur CanpolatHacettepe UniversityAAAhmet Hakan AtesHacettepe University

Key Result

Venoplasty achieved a 100% procedural success rate for venous recanalization and CIED implantation in patients with venous occlusion, without procedural complications.

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess the feasibility, safety, and outcomes of using venoplasty for patients with venous obstruction undergoing cardiac device procedures.
  • Single-center retrospective analysis
  • Inclusion of 12 patients with venous occlusion identified by venography
  • Venoplasty performed using antegrade or retrograde approaches under fluoroscopic guidance
  • Procedural success evaluated based on implantation outcomes
  • 100% procedural success rate in venoplasty and device implantation
  • 11 patients had successful antegrade venoplasty, 1 required retrograde access
  • No procedural complications were noted; however, one patient experienced subacute thrombosis during follow-up

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=12)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does venoplasty facilitate successful CIED implantation or upgrade in patients with venous occlusion?

P
Population
12 patients (median age 69 years; 75% male) with total or subtotal venous occlusion identified by venography undergoing de novo cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation (n=2) or device upgrade (n=10) at a single center.
I
Intervention
Venoplasty (percutaneous balloon angioplasty) using antegrade or retrograde approaches under fluoroscopic guidance, followed by standard CIED implantation.
O
Outcome
Procedural success, defined as successful venous recanalization allowing intended CIED implantation without major procedural complications.composite

Venoplasty is a highly feasible and safe strategy for managing venous occlusion during CIED procedures, achieving 100% procedural success and avoiding the need for lead extraction or contralateral access.

Limitations

  • Small sample size
  • Retrospective single-center design
  • Long-term venous patency and re-occlusion rates were not systematically evaluated using routine imaging follow-up

Abstract

Venous occlusion represents a significant challenge during de novo implantation or upgrading of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), particularly in patients with chronic transvenous leads. Venoplasty may restore venous access while avoiding contralateral implantation or transvenous lead extraction (TLE). To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and procedural outcomes of venoplasty in patients with venous obstruction undergoing de novo CIED implantation or device upgrade. In this single-center retrospective study, 12 patients (median age 69 years; 75% male) who underwent venoplasty for total or subtotal venous occlusion identified by venography between December 2022 and December 2024 were included. Two patients underwent de novo CIED implantation and ten underwent device upgrade procedures. Venoplasty was performed using antegrade or retrograde approaches under fluoroscopic guidance, followed by standard CIED implantation. Total venous occlusion was present in six patients and subtotal occlusion in six. The most common sites of obstruction were the brachiocephalic and subclavian veins. Antegrade venoplasty was successful in 11 patients, while retrograde femoral access was required in one case. Successful venous recanalization and CIED implantation were achieved in all patients (procedural success rate: 100%) without procedural complications. One patient developed subacute thrombosis related to anticoagulant non-compliance during follow-up. Venoplasty is a feasible, effective, and safe strategy for managing venous occlusion during de novo CIED implantation or device upgrade, reducing the need for contralateral access or TLE. This approach should be considered in appropriately selected patients at experienced centers.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Menemencioğlu et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Venous occlusion during CIED implantation or upgrade (n=12). Venoplasty was evaluated on Successful venous recanalization and CIED implantation (procedural success rate). Venoplasty achieved a 100% procedural success rate for venous recanalization and CIED implantation in patients with venous occlusion, without procedural complications.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf59635a333a8214609fcehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-026-02315-9
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper