Key result
Lutathera and Pluvicto share ~68% higher pleural effusion risk, alongside distinct abscess and hematoma profiles.
Why the study?
Lutetium Lu 177-based agents Lutathera and Pluvicto exhibited significant efficacy in clinical trials, but real-world safety validation remained imperative.
What are the real-world safety profiles and mechanistic pathways of adverse events for Lutetium Lu 177-based agents Lutathera and Pluvicto?
What are the real-world safety profiles and mechanistic pathways of adverse events for Lutetium Lu 177-based agents Lutathera and Pluvicto?
Real-world pharmacovigilance data identifies distinct and shared safety profiles for Lu-177 agents Lutathera and Pluvicto, informing clinical monitoring strategies.
Informs tailored monitoring for shared and distinct toxicities with both agents; extends trial safety data with real-world pharmacovigilance signals.
Lutetium Lu 177-based agents Lutathera (targeting SSTR in GEP-NETs) and Pluvicto (targeting PSMA in mCRPC) exhibited significant efficacy in clinical trials, yet real-world safety validation remains imperative. We performed disproportionality analysis on FAERS reports and applied network pharmacology to identify drug targets, construct protein-protein interaction networks, and elucidate adverse event mechanisms through KEGG pathway enrichment. Shared adverse reactions for both agents include pleural effusion (ROR 1.68, 95%CI: 1.03-2.74) and pulmonary embolism (ROR 1.06, 95%CI: 0.61-1.82). Lutathera shows higher risks of gastrointestinal toxicities such as intestinal obstruction (ROR 5.33, 95%CI: 3.82-7.43) and infection-related events like liver abscess (ROR 26.16, 95%CI: 15.73-43.51). Pluvicto is associated with subdural hematoma (ROR 6.91, 95%CI: 3.82-12.5) and loss of libido (ROR 16.29, 95%CI: 10.88-24.38). KEGG pathway enrichment analysis further delineates mechanistic divergence, revealing significant target enrichment in peptide GPCRs (-log10(P) = 62.44) and neuropeptide signaling pathway (-log10(P) = 23.63) for Lutathera versus predominant involvement of proteasome (-log10(P) = 80.59) and peptide ligand-binding receptors (-log10(P) = 22.84) for Pluvicto. This FAERS analysis characterizes agent-specific safety profiles, informing pharmacovigilance strategies. Mechanistic profiling of adverse drug reactions optimizes evidence-based treatment, enhancing medication safety and refining benefit-risk profiles in clinical practice. • FAERS reveals shared and drug-specific safety profiles for Lu-177 agents. • Lutathera linked to GI toxicities and infection-related adverse events. • Pluvicto shows higher risk of subdural hematoma and loss of libido.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question. Lutathera and Pluvicto share pleural effusion risks (ROR 1.68), while Lutathera increases liver abscess risk (ROR 26.16) and Pluvicto increases subdural hematoma risk (ROR 6.91).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: