Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review quantifies toxicity in targeted radioisotope therapy agents, suggesting improved clinical safety monitoring.
The rapid expansion of targeted radioisotope therapy (TRT) in oncology—now encompassing six major agents including Lu-177 DOTATATE (Lutathera), Lu-177 PSMA-617 (Pluvicto), Ra-223 (Xofigo), Ac-225, I-131, and Y-90—has outpaced the development of comprehensive, cross-agent safety syntheses capable of informing clinical decision-making. Individual pivotal trials have characterized agent-specific toxicities, yet no study has systematically integrated clinical trial evidence with post-marketing surveillance data to quantify comparative safety profiles across the TRT class. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to quantify pooled incidence rates of Grade 3–4 adverse events stratified by organ system, establish dose-response relationships between cumulative administered activity and toxicity, and compare safety profiles across six TRT agents through frequentist network meta-analysis, integrating data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and EudraVigilance. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, data were retrieved from PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, FAERS, and EudraVigilance. Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation with DerSimonian-Laird random-effects models was employed for meta-analysis of proportions, supplemented by dose-response meta-regression and frequentist network meta-analysis. The analysis encompassed 2,082 registered trials, 94,015 adverse event rows from 304 trials with posted results, 27,502 FAERS reports, and 6,506 EudraVigilance individual case safety reports across 2,570 PubMed-indexed publications. Hematologic toxicity emerged as the predominant safety concern across all agents, with pooled incidence rates ranging from 70.3% (Xofigo) to 97.6% (Ac-225). Agent-specific toxicity signatures were identified: xerostomia was markedly elevated with PSMA-targeted agents (Pluvicto 59.3%, Ac-225 67.5%), while Xofigo demonstrated the most favorable overall safety profile (average pooled toxicity rate: 46.0%) compared to Ac-225 (77.4%). Post-marketing pharmacovigilance revealed significant disproportionality signals, including Y-90 leukopenia (PRR = 13.5, 95% CI: 11.56–15.84) and Xofigo anaemia (PRR = 3.2, 95% CI: 2.83–3.71). Dose-response meta-regression confirmed dose-dependent toxicity patterns supporting personalized dosimetry approaches. Significant publication bias was detected (Egger’s test p < 0.001), and substantial heterogeneity (I² > 85%) was observed across most pooled estimates. Network meta-analysis geometry identified five direct comparison pairs. This study represents the first comprehensive cross-agent safety synthesis for TRT, providing quantified evidence to support personalized dosimetry, inform clinical monitoring protocols, guide patient selection, and strengthen post-marketing regulatory surveillance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Laszlo Pokorny (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: