Key result
Echocardiography accurately diagnoses PH in uncorrected secundum ASD, with TRV ≥2.96 m/s improving specificity.
Why the study?
Do echocardiographic parameters accurately diagnose pulmonary hypertension compared to right heart catheterization in adult patients with uncorrected secundum atrial septal defect?
Cross-Sectional (n=97)
No
Do echocardiographic parameters accurately diagnose pulmonary hypertension compared to right heart catheterization in adult patients with uncorrected secundum atrial septal defect?
Echocardiographic parameters, particularly PVR estimation and TRV (cutoff ≥2.96 m/s), provide good diagnostic accuracy for pulmonary hypertension in adults with uncorrected secundum ASD, offering a non-invasive alternative to right heart catheterization.
Clinicians may confidently use echo to diagnose PH in uncorrected secundum ASD and reduce invasive testing; extends parameter validation to this population.
PURPOSE: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a progressive complication in adults with atrial septal defect (ASD), significantly impacting prognosis. Although right heart catheterization (RHC) is the gold standard for diagnosis, it is invasive. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of various echocardiographic parameters compared to RHC for detecting PH specifically in adult patients with uncorrected secundum ASD. METHODS: This cross-sectional diagnostic study utilized retrospective data from the COngenital HeARt Disease in adult and Pulmonary Hypertension (COHARD-PH) registry at Sardjito Hospital, Indonesia. The subjects were adult patients with uncorrected secundum ASD who underwent both echocardiography and RHC between January 2023 and July 2025. PH was established based on RHC, defined as mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) > 20 mm Hg. ROC curve analysis and 2 × 2 tables were used to determine the cutoff values, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of echocardiographic parameters using RHC as the gold standard. RESULTS: The study included 97 subjects, with 87 subjects (89.7%) suffering from PH. The echocardiographic parameters with the best accuracy for diagnosing PH were PVR estimation (84.54%), TRV (81.45%), TRPG (81.44%), as well as PASP, mPAP, and the TAPSE/PASP ratio (80.41%). The optimal TRV cutoff value for detecting PH was ≥2.96 m/s (sensitivity 81.6%, specificity 80%). CONCLUSION: Pressure and resistance based echocardiographic parameters, namely, TRV, TRPG, PASP, mPAP, the TAPSE/PASP ratio, and PVR estimation, demonstrate good accuracy in diagnosing PH in adult patients with uncorrected secundum ASD. A TRV cutoff of ≥2.96 m/s improves specificity in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santoso et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Pulmonary hypertension in uncorrected secundum atrial septal defect (n=97). Echocardiographic parameters vs. Right heart catheterization was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy for detecting pulmonary hypertension. Echocardiographic parameters demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy for pulmonary hypertension, with PVR estimation achieving 84.54% accuracy and a TRV cutoff of ≥2.96 m/s yielding 81.6% sensitivity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: