Why the study?
Does incorporating Doppler calculation of pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) improve the detection and classification of pulmonary hypertension compared to standard PASP estimation in patients with tricuspid regurgitation?
Does incorporating Doppler calculation of pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) improve the detection and classification of pulmonary hypertension compared to standard PASP estimation in patients with tricuspid regurgitation?
Incorporating Doppler calculation of PVR into standard echocardiography reclassifies a significant proportion of patients with suspected pulmonary hypertension based on PASP alone, potentially improving diagnostic accuracy.
Doppler estimation of pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) from tricuspid regurgitation velocity is a simple approach to the detection of pulmonary hypertension but may be influenced by right ventricular stroke volume. We sought the clinical utility of incorporating Doppler calculation of pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) into determination of pulmonary hypertension in 578 consecutive patients with tricuspid regurgitation. Right atrial pressure was estimated from vena caval dimensions and collapsibility. Pulmonary hypertension was classified on the basis of a) PASP >35 mmHg, b) age-/gender normalized PASP, c) PVR >2 Wood units. The mean PASP was 40 +/- 13 mmHg and PVR was 1.9 +/- 0.8 Wood units. Standard PASP identified pulmonary hypertension in 58%, compared with 36% by age-/gender normalized PASP (P < 0.0001), and 31% by PVR (P < 0.0001). Of patients who had pulmonary hypertension by PASP, 33% were reclassified as normal on the basis of PVR and 6% were reclassified from normal to pulmonary hypertension. PVR is easy to incorporate into a standard echo exam, and identifies a small group with normal PASP as having PAH, and a larger group of apparently increased PASP as normal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ulett et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: