Multimethod study examines awareness and perceptions of water treatment methods in Mzuzu City, suggesting improvements could enhance adoption.
This study examines the awareness and perceptions influencing the adoption of point-of-use (POU) water treatment in high-density areas of Mzuzu City, Malawi. A multimethod approach was employed, comprising household surveys (n = 322), focus group discussions (n = 5), and key informant interviews (n = 5). Awareness, defined per WHO criteria as knowledge of at least one proven method, access, and health benefits, reached 97.8%, driven by near-universal recognition of boiling (97.8%), with 99.7% aware of sourcing and 100% affirming health benefits. Awareness and attitudes were shaped by socio-economic factors, geographic location, education, income, and asset ownership. Logistic regression identified community type (OR=1.27, 95% CI [1.07–1.51], p = 0.005), drinking water source (OR = 0.73, 95% CI [0.55–0.96], p = 0.022), and assets (OR = 0.82, 95% CI [0.69–0.97], p = 0.019) as key predictors of POU practice. Multinomial regression revealed 62% preferred boiling versus 9% for chlorination; community type increased odds of choosing chlorination (OR = 1.49, 95% CI [1.11–2.00], p = 0.007) and boiling (OR = 1.24, 95% CI [1.04–1.47], p = 0.014). The study concludes that POU treatment has potential to improve quality of life in these areas if barriers are addressed and benefits effectively communicated; and recommends further research in diverse urban settings, inclusive advocacy, and development of affordable, effective POU solutions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mkandawire et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: