Key result
Patients with HFrEF had significantly lower percent predicted peak oxygen uptake (65.9%) compared to those with HFpEF (76.6%) and HFmrEF (76.8%), showing a non-linear pattern of exercise capacity.
Why the study?
This study aimed to compare exercise capacity and comorbidity profiles across heart failure categories defined by left ventricular ejection fraction.
Does exercise capacity and comorbidity profile differ across heart failure ejection fraction categories (HFpEF, HFmrEF, HFrEF)?
Observational (n=196)
No
Does exercise capacity and comorbidity profile differ across heart failure ejection fraction categories (HFpEF, HFmrEF, HFrEF)?
Absolute Event Rate: 65.9% vs 76.6%
p-value: p=<0.001
Supports distinct exercise prescriptions by HF phenotype; challenges linear assumptions of capacity across EF spectrum.
This study aimed to compare exercise capacity (EC) and comorbidity profiles across left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) defined heart failure (HF) categories. From a retrospective, single-centre registry, we analysed 196 individuals with established HF who underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing and a 6 min walk test (6MWT). EC differed significantly across LVEF categories but not in a linear fashion. The percent of predicted peak oxygen uptake (VO₂) was significantly lower in HF with reduced LVEF (HFrEF, n = 89) than in HF with preserved LVEF (HFpEF, n = 36) and HF with mildly reduced LVEF (HFmrEF, n = 71) (65.9% vs. 76.6% and 76.8%, p < 0.001). Ventilatory inefficiency (VE/VCO₂ slope) was more pronounced in HFrEF than in HFpEF (35.3 vs. 31.7; p = 0.002), while the proportion with VE/VCO₂ slope > 36 did not differ across groups. The achieved workload and 6MWT distance were comparable across groups. Comorbidity profiles diverged meaningfully: HFmrEF had the lowest prevalence of chronic kidney disease (p = 0.009) and type 2 diabetes (p = 0.025). Notably, HFpEF exhibited the highest prevalence of anaemia (p = 0.0013). HFmrEF displays an EC profile closer to HFpEF than to HFrEF, while anaemia emerges as a particularly important comorbidity in HFpEF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kurpaska et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=196). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) stratification vs. HFpEF vs HFmrEF vs HFrEF was evaluated on Percent of predicted peak oxygen uptake (peak VO2 %pred) (p=<0.001). Patients with HFrEF had significantly lower percent predicted peak oxygen uptake (65.9%) compared to those with HFpEF (76.6%) and HFmrEF (76.8%), showing a non-linear pattern of exercise capacity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: