Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
April 4, 2026Journal of Professions and OrganizationOpen Access

Individual responses to hybrid professionalism: a systematic literature review and proposal for future research

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

UPUrszula PajdzikNFNa FuDMDaniel Muzio

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Systematic literature review explores individual reactions to hybrid roles, suggesting new research directions.

Key Points

  • This review aims to understand how individual professionals respond to hybrid roles in various fields.
  • Conducted a systematic literature review of sixty-four articles
  • Utilized thematic analysis to identify key responses
  • Examined responses of professionals in hybrid professional-managerial roles
  • Identified three main responses: not taking on hybrid roles, passive hybridizing, and active hybridizing
  • Conceptualized dynamics such as collaborative control and integrative competence
  • Outlined implications for future research on hybrid professionalism

Cite This Study

Pajdzik et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d0af36659487ece0fa52cahttps://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joag006
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1When fears of exclusion meet fears of engulfment: how hybrid medical co-directors modulate role distance2026
  2. 2The “active struggle” of the hybrid middle manager: exploring the notion of ethical resistance2024
  3. 3What is hybrid work? Towards greater conceptual clarity of a common term and understanding its consequences2024 · 107 citations
  4. 4Formalization in Health Care: The Role of Hybrid Professionals2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5Challenges in hybrid management in healthcare: a study of the interplay between divisional managers and clinical directors in a decentralized healthcare organization in Sweden2026