Authors
Consider three qubits A, B, and C which may be entangled with each other. We show that there is a trade-off between A's entanglement with B and its entanglement with C. This relation is expressed in terms of a measure of entanglement called the concurrence, which is related to the entanglement of formation. Specifically, we show that the squared concurrence between A and B, plus the squared concurrence between A and C, cannot be greater than the squared concurrence between A and the pair BC. This inequality is as strong as it could be, in the sense that for any values of the concurrences satisfying the corresponding equality, one can find a quantum state consistent with those values. Further exploration of this result leads to a definition of an essential three-way entanglement of the system, which is invariant under permutations of the qubits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Coffman et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: