Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Conceptual framework proposes a privacy-preserving approach for quantifying communication experiences, indicating future validation pathways.
This record contains the final multilingual submission version of the conceptual design-science paper, An On-Device Conceptual Framework for Structuring Communication Experiences. The paper proposes a privacy-preserving, local-first framework for recording, structuring, and quantifying communication experiences at the level of self-reported interaction episodes rather than scoring persons. The framework defines three system layers (capture, interpretation, reflection), six core dimensions (emotional safety, respect, reciprocity, clarity, predictability, recovery cost), a baseline Communication Experience Index (CEI), a Record Integrity Index (RII), and an optional Relational Variability Index (RVI). It also specifies local storage principles, selective export rules, prohibited-use boundaries, and a roadmap for future validation. This work is a conceptual / non-empirical preprint. It does not report an empirical participant dataset or validated psychometric results. The proposed structure, dimensions, and formulas should therefore be treated as a reproducible research artifact and an initial scholarly specification for future expert review, usability evaluation, structural validation, and longitudinal study. Files included in this record: English submission PDF Korean submission PDF Japanese submission PDF
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eungbin Kim Choi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: