This article proposes a theoretical model of the interpretative architecture of consciousness, describing belief formation through the interaction of three key variables: Interpretative Capacity (IC), Interpretative Openness (IO), and Interpretative Constraint Density (ICD). On the basis of these variables, an aggregated indicator—the Interpretative Freedom Index (IFI)—is introduced as an operationalization of the previously proposed degree of freedom of thought (Fₘ) within the framework of Implant Cognitive Evaluation (ICE). The model describes consciousness as an interpretative phase space, within which different configurations of IC, IO, and ICD generate different cognitive regimes, ranging from reactive-dogmatic to scientific modes of thought. Particular attention is given to the role of cognitive implants as structures that increase the density of interpretative constraints and thereby reduce interpretative freedom. The proposed model integrates the ICE framework, the concept of Dominanta X as a mechanism of the temporary stabilization of an interpretation that has reached dominance, and the model of the human being as a probabilistic cognitive system (Human as a Unit of Multiple Probabilities, HUMP). Within this architecture, the IFI is formally defined as a function of the three variables: IFI = IC × IO × (1 − ICD) The model makes it possible to explain mechanisms of belief formation, the stability of ideological systems, and different types of social mobilization. The article also formulates empirically testable predictions linking the parameters of interpretative space to political polarization, cognitive flexibility, and societal resilience to informational manipulation.
Igor Kaminskyi (Sat,) studied this question.