Key result
Whole-body vibration training lowers resting systolic blood pressure by ~7 mmHg in adults.
Why the study?
Does whole-body vibration training reduce resting blood pressure in adults?
Meta-Analysis (n=490)
Does whole-body vibration training reduce resting blood pressure in adults?
Mean Difference: -6.57 (95% CI -8.84–-4.29)
p-value: p=< 0.01
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Whole-body vibration training significantly reduces resting systolic and diastolic blood pressure in adults, with more pronounced effects in those with higher baseline blood pressure or who are overweight/obese.
Objective To investigate the effect of whole‑body vibration training (WBVT) on resting blood pressure (BP) in adults and its moderating factors through a meta‑analysis.Methods PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science were systematically searched up to December 2, 2025, with systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) as the primary outcomes. Using Stata 17.0 software, effect sizes were pooled with a random‑effects model, and results were reported as weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence intervals.Results This meta-analysis included 14 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 490 adult participants. WBVT significantly reduced SBP (WMD = ‑6.57 mmHg, 95% CI [‑8.84, ‑4.29]; P < 0.01) and DBP (WMD = ‑3.01 mmHg, 95% CI [‑4.32, ‑1.71]; P < 0.01) in adults. Subgroup analyses showed greater BP reduction in individuals with higher baseline BP (SBP: ‑11.34 mmHg [95% CI: ‑13.45, ‑9.23]; P < 0.01; DBP: ‑6.15 mmHg [95% CI: ‑7.46, ‑4.83]; P < 0.01) and in those who were overweight or obese (SBP: ‑8.99 mmHg [95% CI: ‑11.18, ‑6.80]; P < 0.01; DBP: ‑3.98 mmHg [95% CI: ‑5.17, ‑2.78]; P < 0.01). Interventions using combined movement patterns also yielded more pronounced effects (SBP: ‑7.12 mmHg [95% CI: ‑9.73, ‑4.51]; P < 0.01; DBP: ‑3.30 mmHg [95% CI: ‑5.61, ‑0.79]; P < 0.01).Conclusion WBVT significantly reduced resting BP in adults, particularly effective in those with higher baseline BP, overweight/obese, or using combined exercise protocols, but further high-quality RCTs are needed.
Pan et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Resting blood pressure (n=490). Whole-body vibration training (WBVT) vs. Control was evaluated on Systolic blood pressure (SBP) (WMD -6.57, 95% CI -8.84, -4.29, p=< 0.01). Whole-body vibration training significantly reduced resting systolic (WMD -6.57 mmHg; 95% CI -8.84 to -4.29; P<0.01) and diastolic blood pressure in adults.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: