Why the study?
Does contrast-enhanced cine SSFP MRI provide comparable or superior diagnostic value for detecting myocardial inflammation compared to late gadolinium-enhanced MRI in patients with acute myocarditis?
Does contrast-enhanced cine SSFP MRI provide comparable or superior diagnostic value for detecting myocardial inflammation compared to late gadolinium-enhanced MRI in patients with acute myocarditis?
Contrast-enhanced cine SSFP MRI is highly effective for detecting acute myocarditis lesions, offering a higher contrast-to-noise ratio than standard late gadolinium-enhanced sequences.
May support contrast-enhanced cine SSFP MRI for detecting myocardial inflammation in acute myocarditis; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
MRI has become the primary tool for assessment of myocardial inflammation in patients with suspected acute myocarditis. Optimal diagnostic performance is achieved with late gadolinium-enhanced sequences, but cine balanced steady-state free precession (SSFP) MRI sequences are routinely used to evaluate cardiac function. Our aim was to prospectively assess the diagnostic value of unenhanced and contrast-enhanced cine SSFP MRI sequences in comparison with late gadolinium-enhanced sequences for imaging of patients with strong evidence of acute myocarditis.Eighteen patients with strong evidence of acute myocarditis underwent 1.5-T cardiac MRI. Unenhanced and contrast-enhanced cine SSFP images and late gadolinium-enhanced images were obtained. The images were analyzed both qualitatively and quantitatively. Data were analyzed with analysis of variance and the Bonferroni test or paired Student t test.Areas of high signal intensity were detected in 28% (5/18), 94% (17/18), and 89% (16/18) of patients on unenhanced cine, contrast-enhanced cine, and late gadolinium-enhanced images. In one patient, contrast-enhanced cine images revealed subepicardial areas of high signal intensity that were not visible on late gadolinium-enhanced images. The location and transmural nature of involved segments matched on contrast-enhanced cine and late gadolinium-enhanced images (both, r = 0.91, p < 0.0001). The contrast-to-noise ratio was significantly higher on contrast-enhanced cine images than on late gadolinium-enhanced images (p < 0.05).Contrast-enhanced cine MRI is a valuable tool for detection of lesions of acute myocarditis and should be recommended for routine clinical MRI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deux et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: