Key result
Combined CMR achieves 85% diagnostic accuracy for suspected acute myocarditis.
Why the study?
Acute myocarditis is difficult to diagnose, and a CMR approach with clear-cut diagnostic criteria was needed to visualize myocardial inflammatory changes.
Does a combined cardiovascular magnetic resonance approach improve diagnostic accuracy in patients with suspected acute myocarditis?
Case-Control (n=48)
Does a combined cardiovascular magnetic resonance approach improve diagnostic accuracy in patients with suspected acute myocarditis?
Effect estimate: 85% diagnostic accuracy (76% sensitivity, 95.5% specificity)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
May support combined CMR for suspected myocarditis diagnosis; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
Abdel‐Aty et al. (2005) conducted a case-control in Suspected acute myocarditis (n=48). Combined cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) approach vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy) (85% diagnostic accuracy (76% sensitivity, 95.5% specificity)). A combined CMR approach requiring any two of three sequences to be positive yielded 76% sensitivity, 95.5% specificity, and 85% diagnostic accuracy for suspected acute myocarditis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: