Key result
Combined CMR achieves 85% diagnostic accuracy for suspected acute myocarditis.
Why the study?
Acute myocarditis is difficult to diagnose, and a CMR approach with clear-cut diagnostic criteria was needed to visualize myocardial inflammatory changes.
Does a combined cardiovascular magnetic resonance approach improve diagnostic accuracy in patients with suspected acute myocarditis?
Population
25 patients with suspected acute myocarditis and 23 healthy controls
Comparison
Suspected acute myocarditis vs healthy controls
Design
Case-control study
Authors
Loading...
May support combined CMR for suspected myocarditis diagnosis; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
Case-Control (n=48)
Does a combined cardiovascular magnetic resonance approach improve diagnostic accuracy in patients with suspected acute myocarditis?
Effect estimate: 85% diagnostic accuracy (76% sensitivity, 95.5% specificity)
Abdel‐Aty et al. (2005) conducted a case-control in Suspected acute myocarditis (n=48). Combined cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) approach vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy) (85% diagnostic accuracy (76% sensitivity, 95.5% specificity)). A combined CMR approach requiring any two of three sequences to be positive yielded 76% sensitivity, 95.5% specificity, and 85% diagnostic accuracy for suspected acute myocarditis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: