Key result
Comprehensive cardiac magnetic resonance using ECV evaluation alone or combined with T1 mapping achieved 96% sensitivity and 91% accuracy for detecting subacute myocarditis.
Why the study?
Detection of subacute myocarditis using CMR parameters can be challenging due to a lower degree of myocardial inflammation compared to the acute phase.
Does comprehensive cardiac magnetic resonance imaging accurately detect subacute myocarditis in patients with clinically suspected myocarditis?
Observational (n=48)
Does comprehensive cardiac magnetic resonance imaging accurately detect subacute myocarditis in patients with clinically suspected myocarditis?
Comprehensive CMR, particularly ECV and T1 mapping, provides high diagnostic accuracy for detecting subacute myocarditis, though differentiating it from acute myocarditis remains challenging due to overlapping findings.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid noninvasive subacute myocarditis detection; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
(1) Background: Compared to acute myocarditis in the initial phase, detection of subacute myocarditis with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) parameters can be challenging due to a lower degree of myocardial inflammation compared to the acute phase. (2) Objectives: To systematically evaluate non-invasive CMR imaging parameters in acute and subacute myocarditis. (3) Methods: 48 patients (age 37 (IQR 28−55) years; 52% female) with clinically suspected myocarditis were consecutively included. Patients with onset of symptoms ≤2 weeks prior to 1.5T CMR were assigned to the acute group (n = 25, 52%), patients with symptom duration >2 to 6 weeks were assigned to the subacute group (n = 23, 48%). CMR protocol comprised morphology, function, 3D-strain, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging and mapping (T1, ECV, T2). (4) Results: Highest diagnostic performance in the detection of subacute myocarditis was achieved by ECV evaluation either as single parameter or in combination with T1 mapping (applying a segmental or global increase of native T1 > 1015 ms and ECV > 28%), sensitivity 96% and accuracy 91%. Compared to subacute myocarditis, acute myocarditis demonstrated higher prevalence and extent of LGE (AUC 0.76) and increased T2 (AUC 0.66). (5) Conclusions: A comprehensive CMR approach allows reliable diagnosis of clinically suspected subacute myocarditis. Thereby, ECV alone or in combination with native T1 mapping indicated the best performance for diagnosing subacute myocarditis. Acute vs. subacute myocarditis is difficult to discriminate by CMR alone, due to chronological connection and overlap of pathologic findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brendel et al. (2022) conducted an observational in clinically suspected myocarditis (n=48). Comprehensive cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) with ECV and T1 mapping vs. Acute myocarditis was evaluated on Detection of subacute myocarditis. Comprehensive cardiac magnetic resonance using ECV evaluation alone or combined with T1 mapping achieved 96% sensitivity and 91% accuracy for detecting subacute myocarditis.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: