Key result
b-SSFP-Gd identifies acute viral myocarditis lesions with 100% sensitivity and matches standard b-SSFP for LVEF.
Why the study?
It was hypothesized that b-SSFP after gadolinium-based contrast injection enhances cardiac MRI for acute viral myocarditis diagnosis by improving lesion detection and reducing examination time.
Does b-SSFP-Gd accurately detect myocarditis lesions and measure LVEF compared to LGE and standard b-SSFP in patients with acute viral myocarditis?
Observational (n=38)
No
Does b-SSFP-Gd accurately detect myocarditis lesions and measure LVEF compared to LGE and standard b-SSFP in patients with acute viral myocarditis?
b-SSFP-Gd can accurately detect acute viral myocarditis lesions and measure LVEF, potentially reducing overall cardiac MRI examination time by replacing standard b-SSFP.
b-SSFP-Gd may aid acute myocarditis assessment; hypothesis-generating for shorter CMR protocols before practice change.
Background In myocarditis, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides diagnostic and prognostic insights by assessing the presence of myocarditis lesions on late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) sequences and evaluating left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The balanced steady‐state free precession (b‐SSFP) sequence is commonly used to assess LVEF. Recently, b‐SSFP after gadolinium‐based contrast injection (b‐SSFP‐Gd) has been integrated into cardiac MRI protocols. We hypothesized that b‐SSFP‐Gd enhances the MRI protocol for acute viral myocarditis diagnosis by improving lesion detection and reducing examination time. This study simultaneously evaluated the performance of b‐SSFP‐Gd for the detection of acute viral myocarditis lesions compared with the LGE sequence and for LVEF measurement compared with the b‐SSFP sequence. Methods This retrospective single‐center study included 38 patients with strong evidence of acute viral myocarditis. The 17‐Segment American Heart Association classification was used to compare the number of affected segments on LGE and b‐SSFP‐Gd. Diagnostic performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve analysis. LVEF was measured in 30 patients using b‐SSFP and b‐SSFP‐Gd. The results were statistically analyzed using Pearson's correlation, paired t‐tests, and intraclass correlation coefficients. Results The sensitivity and specificity of b‐SSFP‐Gd were 100.0% (95% confidence interval: 90.8%–100.0%) and 100.0% (95% confidence interval: 91.2%–100.0%), respectively, with an area under the curve of 1.000 for lesion detection. The number of segments measured on LGE sections correlated with the number of segments measured on b‐SSFP‐Gd in diastole ( r [36] = 0.83, p < 0.001) and systole ( r [36] = 0.78, p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in LVEF between b‐SSFP and b‐SSFP‐Gd ( p = 0.34). Conclusions b‐SSFP‐Gd more accurately detected myocarditis lesions than the LGE sequence and was as effective as the b‐SSFP sequence for LVEF calculation. b‐SSFP‐Gd could be integrated into cardiac MRI protocols to aid in the diagnosis of acute myocarditis, along with the LGE sequence, while reducing the overall examination time by replacing b‐SSFP for LVEF measurement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khalifa et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Acute viral myocarditis (n=38). b-SSFP after gadolinium-based contrast injection (b-SSFP-Gd) vs. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and b-SSFP sequences was evaluated on Lesion detection (Sensitivity 100.0%, 95% CI 90.8%-100.0%). b-SSFP-Gd accurately detected acute viral myocarditis lesions with 100.0% sensitivity (95% CI 90.8%-100.0%) and 100.0% specificity, and was as effective as b-SSFP for LVEF calculation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: