Why the study?
Does a framework using both untagged and 3-D tagged MR images improve myocardial motion estimation accuracy compared to single-modality approaches in subjects undergoing cardiac MRI?
Does a framework using both untagged and 3-D tagged MR images improve myocardial motion estimation accuracy compared to single-modality approaches in subjects undergoing cardiac MRI?
Combining untagged and 3-D tagged MR images using nonrigid registration improves the accuracy of myocardial motion estimation compared to using either modality alone.
May enhance myocardial motion tracking in cardiac MRI; leaves open prospective clinical validation.
In this paper, we present a novel technique based on nonrigid image registration for myocardial motion estimation using both untagged and 3-D tagged MR images. The novel aspect of our technique is its simultaneous usage of complementary information from both untagged and 3-D tagged MR images. To estimate the motion within the myocardium, we register a sequence of tagged and untagged MR images during the cardiac cycle to a set of reference tagged and untagged MR images at end-diastole. The similarity measure is spatially weighted to maximize the utility of information from both images. In addition, the proposed approach integrates a valve plane tracker and adaptive incompressibility into the framework. We have evaluated the proposed approach on 12 subjects. Our results show a clear improvement in terms of accuracy compared to approaches that use either 3-D tagged or untagged MR image information alone. The relative error compared to manually tracked landmarks is less than 15% throughout the cardiac cycle. Finally, we demonstrate the automatic analysis of cardiac function from the myocardial deformation fields.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shi et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: