Key result
Deformable mesh models for LV motion correlate well with gold-standard 3D end-systolic strain methods.
Why the study?
Does the deformable mesh model (DMM) accurately estimate left ventricular motion from cardiac-gated tagged MRI compared to a feature-based method?
Does the deformable mesh model (DMM) accurately estimate left ventricular motion from cardiac-gated tagged MRI compared to a feature-based method?
Effect estimate: ρ 0.79-0.97
The proposed deformable mesh model provides a robust, automated alternative for estimating left ventricular motion and strain from tagged MRI, correlating well with gold-standard methods.
Supports automated LV strain analysis from tagged MRI; leaves open prospective clinical validation.
In this paper, we propose a deformable mesh model (DMM) method for left-ventricular (LV) motion-estimation from cardiac-gated tagged magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). DMM starts by partitioning short-axis (SA) and long-axis (LA) images at end-diastole (ED) in a collection of non-overlapping mesh elements (triangles). Next, mesh elements are deformed attempting to track temporal changes in pixel intensities by minimizing an image-matching cost function from frame to frame. Finally, dense motion fields can be obtained at any frame from the displacement of mesh nodes, without any additional user interaction. For validation, 23 human tagged MRI studies were used, allocated as 7 normal, 9 hypertensive (HTN), and 7 with mitral regurgitation (MR). DMM end-systolic (ES) motion and strains were quantitatively compared to a “gold-standard” feature-based (FB) motion analysis method that includes manual tagline editing. DMM motion achieves subpixel average displacement error of SA landmarks with respect to FB. 3-D ES strains obtained from DMM correlate well with FB method (ρ ranging from 0.79 to 0.97). Finally, we show temporal curves for several DMM strain components, grouped according to the condition of patients (normal and diseased). These curves are qualitatively compared to a strain from unwrapped harmonic phase motion estimation algorithm. DMM produces robust temporal curves, which capture strain fluctuations reported in medical literature for HTN and MR conditions. This makes it a viable alternative to analyze motion from images at phases suffering from low contrast-to-noise ratio that may convey important information about the presence of certain cardiac pathologies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parages et al. (2017) studied Hypertension and Mitral Regurgitation (n=23). Deformable mesh model (DMM) method vs. Feature-based (FB) motion analysis method was evaluated on 3-D end-systolic (ES) strains and motion (ρ 0.79-0.97). A deformable mesh model (DMM) for left-ventricular motion estimation correlated well with a gold-standard feature-based method for 3-D end-systolic strains (ρ ranging from 0.79 to 0.97).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: