Why the study?
Does a deformable mesh model accurately estimate 3D myocardial strain from MRI image sequences compared to an active-contour tracking algorithm?
Does a deformable mesh model accurately estimate 3D myocardial strain from MRI image sequences compared to an active-contour tracking algorithm?
The deformable mesh model shows potential as a computational tool for extracting diagnostic 3D myocardial strain and torsion information from cardiac MRI sequences.
Mesh modeling enables 3D myocardial strain mapping from MRI; leaves open clinical adoption pending prospective validation.
Analysis of myocardial strain plays an important role in cardiac MRI, since fluctuations in the strain pattern of the heart may be a sign of cardiac abnormalities. In order to extract strain information, cardiac deformation must be estimated from a set of cardiac-gated MR images. In previous works, we developed a deformable mesh model (DMM) to describe 3D myocardial motion from MRI. In DMM, left ventricle motion was estimated by deforming a 3D mesh to match with inter-frame pixel-intensity variations of a combined gated tagged and untagged MRI image sequence of the heart. In this work, from an estimated DMM we compute myocardial 3D strain maps by applying a prolate spheroidal B-spline model (PSB), and we compare it to a reference model which uses an active-contour (i.e. snakes) tracking algorithm. Furthermore, we show a comparison of DMM-based strain measurements (torsion) obtained from healthy and abnormal MRI datasets, showing the diagnostic potential of the DMM technique.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parages et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: