Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
October 11, 2017British Journal of Sports Medicine

The authors argue that focusing on injury/illness incidence alone may give an incomplete and erroneous picture of risk, and that injury severity and burden should also be considered.

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Design

Editorial

Authors

RBRoald BahrBCBenjamin ClarsenJEJan Ekstrand

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Incorporating burden alongside incidence may refine athlete risk assessment; leaves open standardized metrics for future surveillance studies.

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Bahr et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d5720a75589c71d767e408https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2017-098160
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Are prevalence measures better than incidence measures in sports injury research?2017 · 30 citations
  2. 2Matching the choice of injury/illness definition to study setting, purpose and design: one size does not fit all!2014 · 213 citations
  3. 3Methods for injury surveillance in international cricket2005 · 141 citations
  4. 4International consensus statement on injury surveillance in cricket: a 2016 update2016 · 141 citations
  5. 5Injury surveillance in cricket2013 · 13 citations