This consensus statement updates the 2005 recommendations for injury surveillance in cricket, providing new definitions and incidence units to improve research comparability.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Standardizes injury tracking for cricket clinicians; extends 2005 consensus to enable comparable research across contexts.
Cricket was the first sport to publish recommended methods for injury surveillance in 2005. Since then, there have been changes to the nature of both cricket and injury surveillance. Researchers representing the major cricket playing nations met to propose changes to the previous recommendations, with an agreed voting block of 14. It was decided that 10 of 14 votes (70%) were required to add a new definition element and 11 of 14 (80%) were required to amend a previous definition. In addition to the previously agreed 'Match time-loss' injury, definitions of 'General time-loss', 'Medical presentation', 'Player-reported' and 'Imaging-abnormality' injuries are now provided. Further, new injury incidence units of match injuries per 1000 player days, and annual injuries per 100 players per year are recommended. There was a shift towards recommending a greater number of possible definitions, due to differing contexts and foci of cricket research (eg, professional vs amateur; injury surveillance systems vs specific injury category studies). It is recommended that researchers use and report as many of the definitions as possible to assist both comparisons between studies within cricket and with those from other sports.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Orchard et al. (2016) studied Cricket injuries. Updated injury surveillance definitions vs. 2005 recommendations was evaluated on Consensus on injury definitions. An international consensus updated cricket injury surveillance recommendations to include new definitions and incidence units to assist comparisons across different research contexts.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: