Patients submitted to valve replacement with mechanical or biological prosthesis
Echocardiographic and Doppler techniques (transthoracic echocardiography, transesophageal echocardiography, and 3D-TEE)
This review highlights the utility of various echocardiographic modalities, particularly noting that 3D-TEE is superior to 2D-TEE for assessing paravalvular leak regurgitation in prosthetic heart valves.
Patients submitted to valve replacement with mechanical or biological prosthesis, may present symptoms related either to valvular malfunction or ventricular dysfunction from other causes. Because a clinical examination is not sufficient to evaluate a prosthetic valve, several diagnostic methods have been proposed to assess the functional status of a prosthetic valve. This review provides an overview of echocardiographic and Doppler techniques useful in evaluation of prosthetic heart valves. Compared to native valves, echocardiographic evaluation of prosthetic valves is certainly more complex, both for the examination and the interpretation. Echocardiography also allows discriminating between intra- and/or peri-prosthetic regurgitation, present in the majority of mechanical valves. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) requires different angles of the probe with unconventional views. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is the method of choice in presence of technical difficulties. Three-dimensional (3D)-TEE seems to be superior to 2D-TEE, especially in the assessment of paravalvular leak regurgitation (PVL) that it provides improved localization and analysis of the PVL size and shape.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Chiara Sordelli
Ospedale Monaldi
Sergio Severino
Ospedale Monaldi
P Coppolino
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"
Journal of Cardiovascular Echography
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"
Ospedale Monaldi
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sordelli et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d5720e75589c71d767e45f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/2211-4122.147201